Update: In the above video, there is a portion of of one of my interviews which I edited in such a way that the conversation flow was interrupted, so I’ve posted an uninterrupted portion of that conversation below:
-
Recent Posts
- Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Nonsense from the NY Times
- Healthcare.gov username requirement
- Not knowing what the word “mock” means
- Double-counting?
- Innumeracy at CNN
- Obama must not believe that insurance companies act in their own self-interest
- Challenge for my brother
- Bob Wright Makes a Bad Argument
- Iowa Caucuses
- Wrong Again
- A Confusing Attempt to Take Money from Subway Riders and Taxpayers
- Faulty News Article
- What an odd justice system
- Insider Trading
- Cool Puzzle
- More Handouts for the 1% (i.e. Salman Rushdie and Michael Moore)
- Silliness on Steve Jobs’ Legacy as a “Job Creator”
- Puzzle about Journalism
- Last Night’s Debate
- More Interviews from Occupy Wall Street (update below)
- Interview with Jesse LaGreca, a Blogger for the DailyKos
- Freed Prisoners Occupy Wall Street
- Occupy Wall Street Investigation
- “The worst idea ever”
- Answer to Running Puzzle
- Glenn Greenwald Confuses the Readers
- The Unaddressed Question
- Moral Absolutes
- Sam Harris Weighs In on Income Inequality
Recent Comments
- GoseeBype on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Gelarden on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- ~Pearl-of-Light~ on Freed Prisoners Occupy Wall Street
- indirection on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Superchipsptt on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- DbgvGadly on Double-counting?
- Focuskjs on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Linksyspsc on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Plastictng on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Sandervze on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Nespressoqyo on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Boschjbx on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Rigidtzo on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Universaluih on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Vintagemyv on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
Archives
Tags
analogies beliefs betting bias Bill Clinton blackmail Christopher Hitchens citizen journalism computer science conspiracy theories economics ethics food game theory Glenn Greenwald hypocrisy israel journalism Kervorkian Krugman language law Leo Katz liberals libertarianism logic math Mickey Kaus money morals NY Times Obama Occupy Wall Street philosophy poitics politics puzzles religion republicans social science symmetry torture war YglesiasBlogroll
Meta
I’m not sure how peppering everyday people with questions about radical policies that many of them probably haven’t really thought through (returning land to Mexico, overthrowing the US gov’t, and other radical policy changes that are not generally on the minds/agendas of regular citizens) really adds to the conversation. It sounds like a lot of these answers that are being given to your questions are off the cuff and don’t represent the actual issues that they are there to advocate for. Why don’t you let them talk about their own issues instead of penning them in with your questions about topics that are complicated, consequential and beyond the realm of where most of these people feel comfortable commenting upon.
These interviews are absolutely amazing.
thanks.