-
Recent Posts
- Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Nonsense from the NY Times
- Healthcare.gov username requirement
- Not knowing what the word “mock” means
- Double-counting?
- Innumeracy at CNN
- Obama must not believe that insurance companies act in their own self-interest
- Challenge for my brother
- Bob Wright Makes a Bad Argument
- Iowa Caucuses
- Wrong Again
- A Confusing Attempt to Take Money from Subway Riders and Taxpayers
- Faulty News Article
- What an odd justice system
- Insider Trading
- Cool Puzzle
- More Handouts for the 1% (i.e. Salman Rushdie and Michael Moore)
- Silliness on Steve Jobs’ Legacy as a “Job Creator”
- Puzzle about Journalism
- Last Night’s Debate
- More Interviews from Occupy Wall Street (update below)
- Interview with Jesse LaGreca, a Blogger for the DailyKos
- Freed Prisoners Occupy Wall Street
- Occupy Wall Street Investigation
- “The worst idea ever”
- Answer to Running Puzzle
- Glenn Greenwald Confuses the Readers
- The Unaddressed Question
- Moral Absolutes
- Sam Harris Weighs In on Income Inequality
Recent Comments
- GoseeBype on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Gelarden on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- ~Pearl-of-Light~ on Freed Prisoners Occupy Wall Street
- indirection on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Superchipsptt on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- DbgvGadly on Double-counting?
- Focuskjs on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Linksyspsc on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Plastictng on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Sandervze on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Nespressoqyo on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Boschjbx on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Rigidtzo on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Universaluih on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
- Vintagemyv on Confusing (but Free) Editorializing
Archives
Tags
analogies beliefs betting bias Bill Clinton blackmail Christopher Hitchens citizen journalism computer science conspiracy theories economics ethics food game theory Glenn Greenwald hypocrisy israel journalism Kervorkian Krugman language law Leo Katz liberals libertarianism logic math Mickey Kaus money morals NY Times Obama Occupy Wall Street philosophy poitics politics puzzles religion republicans social science symmetry torture war YglesiasBlogroll
Meta
Tag Archives: morals
More Handouts for the 1% (i.e. Salman Rushdie and Michael Moore)
Salman Rushdie, joined by Michael Moore and 45,000 others, have signed an online petition to ask Jamshed Bharacha, the president of the Cooper Union (a private school in New York City), to reverse his decision to raise the monthly rent … Continue reading
Moral Absolutes
I just read an essay by a guy named Jeremy Waldron who discusses “moral absolutes,” and attempts to defend his own “absolute” position against torture, i.e. the view that torture is always morally wrong, no matter the circumstances. He identifies … Continue reading
Illegality of Blackmail (a test)
I’ve finished Leo Katz’s book. The basic question of the book is “Why is blackmail illegal?” It seems odd that it is illegal — so odd that lawyers have coined the term “The Paradox of Blackmail.” Consider the standard case: … Continue reading
Is what a politician does with his animals his own business?
Some people (for convenience, I’ll use the word “liberals” to refer to those people) argued in the wake of the Weiner scandal that politicians’ personal lives should not be our concern. They can’t really believe that, though. Suppose a politician … Continue reading
“Statistical Evidence Paradox”: bogus
Here is a criminal law version of [a] problem. Defendants are both hunters. They recklessly fire bullets in a direction where they heard a rustle even though they have good grounds for fearing that the rustle might have been caused … Continue reading
Chris Christie: a Sinner
According to Chris Christie’s wife, “her husband’s family responsibilities preclude a run for the presidency.” According to many Republicans, Christie represents our country’s best hope for getting off of the path to ruin that Obama has charted for us. And … Continue reading
“Forgiveness”: A non-sequitur?
I’m reading the book Ill-gotten Gains: Evasion, Blackmail, Fraud, and Kindred Puzzles of the Law by Leo Katz, and so far the book has been an interesting exploration of the question of whether and why it may be ok for 2 … Continue reading
Mickey Kaus
asks a funny question: If a Tweet Falls in the Forest …: Hmm. You know those attractive women who want to friend you on Facebook? They may be fictitious “bimbots.” Which raises the question: What if Anthony Weiner had sent photos of his … Continue reading
One more round on Kervorkian
Ross Douthat, responding to a blogger (called “Drum”) who raised basically the same objections as I did to his Kervorkian critique, writes: For Drum, though, a question: Assuming that the would-be suicide is of sound-enough mind and uncoerced, are there … Continue reading
Ross Douthat on Kervorkian
Could it ever be more wrong to assist someone commit an act than to commit the act itself? It seems generally like it isn’t: the accomplice to the bank robbery is obviously less culpable than the robber. But Ross Douthat … Continue reading